AIG sees uncertainty in too big to fail label for insurers filing

← Homepage

Insurance giant American International Group sees "considerable uncertainty" about U.S. regulations that deem non-bank financial institutions as being too big to fail, given the recent change in White House administrations, according to a filing. The "appropriateness and federal regulation" of non-bank too-big-to-fail institutions may also be questioned, AIG wrote in its 2016 annual filing. AIG is among a small number of insurers deemed by the U.S. government as being systemically important to the economy. The label, which comes from the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform law, subjects certain insurers and banks to tougher supervision and capital requirements. AIG's near-collapse in 2008 and its $182 billion bailout by the U.S. government led to its inclusion in the Federal Reserve's list of "systemically important financial institutions," known as SIFIs.

The election of President Donald Trump has led to speculation in the financial services industry and on Wall Street that the label and the requirements it imposes could be abolished. Trump's campaign promises included dismantling the Dodd-Frank law, which was passed in the wake of the 2007-09 financial crisis. On Feb. 3, Trump ordered a review of Dodd-Frank reforms. Trump has said his administration expects "to be cutting a lot out of Dodd-Frank," although the scope of Trump's plans is unclear.

Tax reform, which Trump has also discussed, could affect AIG as well, the insurer said in its filing. A change in the U.S. corporate tax rate could reduce the values of its deferred tax assets and investments in tax-exempt securities, AIG said.

SEC will not appeal ruling preventing certain retroactive penalties WASHINGTON The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has decided not to appeal a court ruling that limited its ability to punish bad actors for misconduct that predated the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street reforms, the agency announced Thursday.

Companies with long-term view do prevail: James Saft In a world in which most investment managers are paid to be short- or medium-term in their thinking, companies taking the long view prove the best bet.

Why living longer should not lead to retirement benefit cuts CHICAGO When you hear a politician start a sentence with the phrase "We’re all living longer," grab your wallet. You are about to be told that Social Security or Medicare benefits should be cut because of America’s rising longevity.